Discussions about how to Improve Social Financing are recurrent – and that’s the way it should be

There is no event, publication or discussion about social financing that doesn’t point to the mismatch between the provision of capital supposedly designated to create impact and the financing needs of social enterprises. Innovative forms of financing have been designed in the last years, including patient capital, crowdfunding or social impact bonds, and the amount of capital theoretically deployed as impact investment continues to increase. As statistics from the Global Impact Investment Network (GIIN) show, overall, more than USD $12 billion in impact investments have been deployed in emerging markets in 2019 – compared to approximately USD $7 billion in 2015.[1]

However, these figures refer to a wide understanding of impact investment and include investments made with market-rate financial return expectations included. If we only look at deals made with below-market-rate expectations, the investment sum shrinks to around USD $280 million.[2] This resonates with reports from social entrepreneurs and their representatives who state that access to appropriate funding remains a considerable challenge for the vast majority of social enterprises around the world.

While many actors in this space are feeling tired of these discussions, we insist that these discussions are much needed and advantageous. Even more, they are mandatory in order to tackle the substantial gaps that persist in the financial infrastructure of the impact sector.

Some epNetwork members learning the language of finance at an epWorkshop in 2019.

This is one of the key findings of Siemens Stiftung’s new report ‘How Digital Solutions May Enhance Social Financing’, for which Studio Nima collaborated as editing partner. As the results of multi-stakeholder discussions and working sessions that we have conducted over the last months have shown, there are digital solutions that, indeed, have the potential to enhance the social financing sector. Effective solutions should address certain pain points such as improving matchmaking between suitable funders and social finance seekers or by making the due diligence process more efficient and, thus, more affordable. Such measures can significantly contribute to making the whole sector more impactful.

The opportunities for digitalization of due diligence processes can be looked at by intensity of efforts and digital potential.

However, what all discussions have shown: it won’t be a one-size-fits-all solution. The heterogeneity of the impact sector, the differences in culture and expectations, as well as the amount of possible misunderstandings are so big that any solution that tries to integrate everything is likely to fail. Smaller solutions are needed; ones that tackle bits and pieces of the financial infrastructure for social enterprises while, at the same time, ensuring interoperability with other existing solutions that are commonly used in the sector. In the field of matchmaking, this could include solutions that help pool players around similar missions, provide reputation tracking and indicators about responsiveness. Solutions could also focus on setting standards regarding the use of existing software, e.g. through partnerships.

In the field of due diligence, digital solutions could focus on specific parts of this process that are usually time- and resource-intense, such as financial forecasts, historical accounts, an analysis of the business strategy & market performance, or a focus on legal and regulatory compliance.

Digital solutions could focus on the validation of data accuracy and coherence. Machine learning algorithms could transform diverse input formats of documents into standardized outputs for more homogeneity and comparability in due diligence or take over the validation of assumptions made in business plans based on market research.

Furthermore, these smaller digital solutions need to be accompanied by strong offline support for social entrepreneurs to learn how to become more attractive for investors and for investors to learn how to adapt their products and services to the realities of social entrepreneurs. This is even more relevant when investors with Western backgrounds are seeking investment deals in the Global South and vice versa. Capable mediators that speak the jargon of experienced financing professionals and have the necessary know-how about local markets are essential in order to translate their knowledge into workable instructions for social entrepreneurs and investors.

If social financing – and by this we mean any type of financing that explicitly seeks to create social or environmental impact – is to significantly contribute to solving significant global challenges and achieve the Sustainable Development Goals, it simply needs much more impact-oriented funding that truly meets the needs of organizations that deliver on social missions. This requires entering into a blunt discussion, showing sincere interest in each other’s position and developing solutions that further deviate from long-established processes of the commercial and philanthropic financing sector. Particularly in a world that is increasingly relying on digital workflows – today more than ever – we are deeply convinced that new technologies can be of considerable help and should be supported by players who ideally prioritize impact over profitability of such solutions.

Some important milestones on our journey towards a sustainable social impact environment for both SocEnts and impact investors.

We, thus, encourage all involved parties, particularly funders and finance intermediaries, to expose themselves to those honest – and possibly recurrent – discussions, and agree on common standards. With this, parts of the matchmaking and due diligence process may effectively be digitalized step-by-step. Convening partners, such as Siemens Stiftung, whose mission lies in supporting impact organizations, are ideal players for facilitating this process and making sure it accounts for the voices of social entrepreneurs.

Leonhard Nima (Co-Founder Studio Nima)

Leonhard Nima’s expertise builds on +10 years of social innovation work experience in more than 20 countries. He has incubated, grown, advised and consulted social businesses around the globe working in various fields, including plastic waste reduction, fair fashion, sustainable mobility and many more. Leonhard is also an experienced moderator and speaker at international conferences, such as the Global Social Business Summit, One Young World & TEDx. As the co-Founder of N3XTCODER, he has also deep expertise in applying technology for social impact.

Dr. Aline Laucke (Chief Impact Officer Studio Nima)

Aline Laucke has served as a consultant for social enterprise, social financing and corporate responsibility for +10 years in developing, emerging and developed markets. She holds a PhD in management and organization theory, for which she investigated strategic paradoxes in organizations that provide essential goods and services to low-income populations. Aline has taught classes for bachelor, masters, and executive masters students on the topics of social enterprise, social innovation, social financing and base of the pyramid strategies.

Studio Nima implements social innovation and social business projects together with companies, foundations, civil society organizations and academic partners. The services include workshops & trainings, practitioner-oriented research, social innovation concepts and social business planning, as well as support with the implementation of actual initiatives.

0 replies

Leave a Reply

Want to join the discussion?
Feel free to contribute!
Confirmation requested
Our website uses the "Google reCAPTCHA" to prevent spam comments. Since you have not given your general consent to cookies, you must confirm that you want to comment and that you agree to allow cookies to be set and data to be transferred to Google.